- September 1, 2016 at 6:19 am #16984
I was a fairly early adopter to 3D printing. (I sort of backed the wrong horse by buying a first generation “UP! Personal Portable 3D Printer” which has since completely fallen out of support and uses entirely proprietary parts and software.) Despite this, I’ve never done any of the standard projects like using my current 3D printer to build a better one. After shopping around for an interesting project that I might get some use out of, I found this one and jumped at the chance.
The trusty, rust UP! started to act up, so I threw $200 at the Monoprice Select Mini. It has proved to be remarkably capable. Attached is a print of a doubled up part. But its 120x120x120 build volume is a tiny bit too small for the XYZ piece(s). I’m most of the way through printing the rest of the parts. As we speak the first monstrous XY piece is underway. I’ve got some harebrained schemes to maybe make a temporary XYZ set. (We’re talking things involving dovetails and superglue.) If any of those worked, I would use the MPCNC itself to print its own replacement. It is a plan that doesn’t fill me with confidence. Thus I wondered if, as Plan C, I could buy just that piece when the time comes to buy the hardware kit. I think in my perusal of the forum I’ve seen that question come up before, but I’ll be darned if I can find it again.
Attachments:September 1, 2016 at 7:14 am #16988
I can sell you the parts if you need them.
I think the best place to split it, if you want to try and print it, is right at the middle bearing. The spot where the 2.5″ bolt goes through. It makes sense to me now, with very little coffee in me. That way the bolt would keep pressure on the seam and I don’t think there are many other forces acting on the part right there. If it doesn’t work I can get you a price.September 1, 2016 at 7:22 am #16990
Cool. It’ll be two or three days before I finally start my experimentation on that part, but I’ll run it by you when I do. Thanks for the quick reply, by the way.
Another thought I had, now that I’m about 90 print-hours past the point of no return. I picked the design intended for the smallest conduit diameter, with the expectation that every little bit of size reduction would increase my chances of actually getting the parts printed out of my dinky machine. Assuming I succeed in completing it, would you say the 1-inch model is a superior choice if I decide to upgrade in the future? It seems like it simplifies the purchase of pipe, at the very least.September 1, 2016 at 7:31 am #16992
The 1″, at least in the US, Only fits on 1″OD stainless steel tubing. Costs about $6 a foot, It is better but depends on what your doing with it if it’s worth it for you. SS is more rigid and smoother.September 1, 2016 at 7:36 am #16994
Okay, cool. Many thanks once again. I’ll pop back in to share the results of my experiment, or to announce if/when I give in to frustration.September 3, 2016 at 1:00 pm #17134
Just wanted to show off my first attempt. I printed with a central split, sanded on a piece of glass to get a reasonably flat glue joint, and super glued them together. If that proves insufficient, I’ll try with a dovetail, or more likely give in and pay for a print. In the mean time, I’ve ordered the bundle and some of the tools I’ll require.
I’ve attached a picture. Note the cutting edge “Gravity Assisted Clamping/Not Gluing It To My Work Bench” technique.
Attachments:September 8, 2016 at 6:24 pm #17422
Here’s an update for you. The glued part, at the very least, has held together through the assembly process. It turns out my printer makes the outer dimensions about 0.2 mm too big, so all of the holes are super tight. This meant I was literally hammering on the long bolt at one point and it still held together. But the deed is done, no worrisome cracks or snaps except for one of the feet (thanks to the corner lock tabs being oversized and hard to put into install. We’ll see how the rest of it goes.
Attachments:September 17, 2016 at 5:22 am #17862
As a conclusion to this little adventure, I’ve gotten the device working well enough to print a solid version of the very piece that was too large for the printer I used to BUILD the device. So the next one I build (and I’m almost certain to build a next one) will be stronger and sturdier than the first.
Attachments:September 17, 2016 at 9:04 am #17875
That has got to feel pretty cool, build a machine to make parts to build itself better?September 17, 2016 at 4:36 pm #17900
Yeah! It feels kind of like I used the crowbar inside a crate to open the crate to get the crowbar.October 23, 2016 at 10:27 am #19937
hey Jo Lallo using the mini to make the parts how did you print the xyz part, i understand how you cut the xy part but i can only think of splitting the xyz in the middle to print it on the mp select mini????October 23, 2016 at 11:19 am #19943
For me, when using Cura to slice it, I just rotated it a few degrees at a time until it fit.
Attachments:October 23, 2016 at 11:46 am #19945
Jo Lallo what do you have your cura settings set at for the bed size ????October 23, 2016 at 11:56 am #19947
I’m away from home for a while, so I can’t check, but I think it’s 120x120mmNovember 15, 2016 at 11:18 pm #21066
Trevor van RooyenParticipant
Don’t suppose you wanna post updated STL..
I’m having Same exact issue, I am 2 prints from having all my parts.
Much AppreciatedNovember 16, 2016 at 7:12 am #21069November 17, 2016 at 11:04 pm #21129
Trevor van RooyenParticipant
Thank you VERY VERY MUCH
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.