Some project ideas at Zenziwerken

New Home Forum Things You Have Made Some project ideas at Zenziwerken

This topic contains 13 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  David Walling 4 months, 1 week ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #33279

    Jeffeb3
    Participant

    https://www.zenziwerken.de/Haushaltsgegenstaende/Tritthocker

    All these designs are on thingiverse, which is awesome, and they have reasonable donation buttons. Lots of good ideas in there.

    The only downside is I have trouble spelling the name, or saying it, or reading it.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #33281

    Ryan
    Keymaster

    This lamp is super sexy! Nice find. Gives me a few ideas.
    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1776160

    #33284

    Jeffeb3
    Participant

    That lamp is neat.

    It makes me sad that material thickness isn’t constant everywhere. It’s a real shame. If everything was 6, 12, and 18mm plywood, these designs would be a lot more useful. Right now, you pretty much have to pull them into CAD to make it work with your material.

    I hate it when designs have the dogbones in the CAD too. The CAM software supports adding overcuts while doing the CAM. It would be nice if there was also a way to define these 3 sides as a slot, and have CAM adjust for small variations in material thickness. I’m not hoping it would take a 6mm design and make it work with 18mm, but it would be nice if you could just click a “slot” button in EstlCAM, and then click on all the slots and make them all 17.5mm or 18.5mm, or something. Depending on the geometry, that would get increasingly complicated, but maybe some of the issues could be fixed that way. It sure would be nice /daydream . Maybe I should just cut a bunch of shims.

    Back on topic though, I really appreciate when people share a bunch of work like this. I hope she/he is making enough on donations to keep the lights on, and keep it interesting for him/her.

    #33299

    Barry
    Participant

    I’ve made a couple of his designs. The fruit bowl and a couple of the trivets.

    #33300

    David Walling
    Participant

    I’m making this one just so I can tell people what it is when they ask

    https://www.zenziwerken.de/Spielsachen/Kastanienbohrer

    #33301

    Jeffeb3
    Participant
    I’m making this one just so I can tell people what it is when they ask

    I hope you call it a “Kastanienbohrer”.

    #33305

    Ryan
    Keymaster

    I have been putting a lot of thought into this issue. Since trying to design a cool LowRider table. I came to the conclusion that just putting a center line on any material thick specific cuts should work the best. So instead of a slot put a center line the correct length than it is easy to add the right size square in CAD or even inkscape/illustrator. I figure this is more work than most would want to do so I didn’t spend too much time developing the idea.

    That is exactly what sucks about those sorts of designs though. When I made the MP3DP I had to make all parts only reference one side of the material and make sure the thickness could vary by more than an inch if necessary.

    #33310

    Jeffeb3
    Participant

    You’re onto something here. If EstlCAM could expand that for you, how great would that be? Especially if it could just be on a different layer in the DXF or something. That would be something. It sure would be nice if thingiverse was as easy for CNC as it is for 3DP. I bet it wouldn’t be too hard to write a plugin to do that in OnShape or fusion, but at that point, you’re already in the CAD program.

    Things like 3 layer joints, where the spacing of the slots is dependent on the thickness would be tougher, but maybe don’t solve all the problems at once…

    #33358

    David Walling
    Participant

    This is where something like OpenSCAD is nice. Since you can set values to items dynamically. Unfortunately, that requires the designer to learn it and us it.

    #33359

    Jeffeb3
    Participant

    The customizer in thingiverse working with openscad is nice, but it’s a little slow, and the previews sometimes just freeze the whole thing. I’m also not sure you can export dxf files from customizer.

    If you are talking going all the way to me having openscad installed, then that would work too, but I don’t have it installed, ATM. Also, I find openscad to be a pretty hard way to draw most things. CAD is to tactile, that text is just not a good mind meld, IMO. I’m a software engineer, so I thought I would really like it. Most CAD programs have some kind of parameters or variables you can drive your design with. That’s a good workaround, but I just wish I didn’t have to open any CAD programs. I want to just download the thing from TV, open it in EstlCAM, and cut it. Just like I do with 3D printers (s/EstlCAM/Slic3r/g).

    #33363

    David Walling
    Participant

    True. I’ve had a few issues with the customizer on thingiverse too.

    I guess openscad didn’t scare me quite as much. I had a lot of experience with povray when in college… to the point I wrote my own C-based wrapper for sending rendering jobs to a mosix cluster I built. Something oddly satisfying about using floppies and netbooting 32 desktops at night to run large povray renderings in the lab I managed on campus…

    I’ll admit I’ve only glanced at openscad so far.

    If I understand your problem is actually that the TV design is for 7mm material and yours is thicker, or you can’t find the exact width he used…

    Just write a blanket CAM that faces your material to the thickness of the design 🙂

    #33366

    Barry
    Participant
    True. I’ve had a few issues with the customizer on thingiverse too.

    I guess openscad didn’t scare me quite as much. I had a lot of experience with povray when in college… to the point I wrote my own C-based wrapper for sending rendering jobs to a mosix cluster I built. Something oddly satisfying about using floppies and netbooting 32 desktops at night to run large povray renderings in the lab I managed on campus…

    I’ll admit I’ve only glanced at openscad so far.

    If I understand your problem is actually that the TV design is for 7mm material and yours is thicker, or you can’t find the exact width he used…

    Just write a blanket CAM that faces your material to the thickness of the design ?

    Heh, we netbooted our iMac labs to run handbreak, so we could backup, stuff…?

    #33370

    Jeffeb3
    Participant
    If I understand your problem is actually that the TV design is for 7mm material and yours is thicker, or you can’t find the exact width he used…

    It’s not an issue with these specific designs. I’m spoiled by 3D printing, I guess. I can take 90% of the STLs and just slice them with default settings, but it seems like every time I want to make something in CAM, I have to get my calipers out, and fire up the CAD. I just want it to be easier. Maybe if manufacturers had the same specs in Europe as they did here it would be possible to just use them as is.

    #33376

    David Walling
    Participant
    True. I’ve had a few issues with the customizer on thingiverse too.

    I guess openscad didn’t scare me quite as much. I had a lot of experience with povray when in college… to the point I wrote my own C-based wrapper for sending rendering jobs to a mosix cluster I built. Something oddly satisfying about using floppies and netbooting 32 desktops at night to run large povray renderings in the lab I managed on campus…

    I’ll admit I’ve only glanced at openscad so far.

    If I understand your problem is actually that the TV design is for 7mm material and yours is thicker, or you can’t find the exact width he used…

    Just write a blanket CAM that faces your material to the thickness of the design ?

    <span class=”et_quote_sign”></span>

    Heh, we netbooted our iMac labs to run handbreak, so we could backup, stuff…?

    We didn’t allow mp3s to be saved on the lab’s systems, so we ran a nightly cron to find them and ‘remove’ them to a central system… you know.. in case the end user asked where their file went we could restore it from backup. God only knows how many ‘backups’ we had of that central system.

    I hear ya on the CAM stuff. I think the big problem comes down to the material being used. 3D printers don’t care what material it is as the slicer deals with the logistics. With CAM, your material is a huge concern. With a CAM design, you don’t know if the end user will use wood, metal, foam… like you said… what thickness… etc etc… It’s just too variable.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.